Obama administration wants to eliminate conscience rights for health care providers to advance abortion

The Obama administration wants to eliminate conscience rights for health care providers. You can help prevent this from happening, but you must act immediately. Health and Human Services (HHS) is accepting public comments on this during a 30 day period which ends on April 9, 2009. Time is ticking. Go to www.freedom2care.org and send a message today. (Please remember to remove the names and addresses of others when forwarding this email).

In the past, Congress has passed laws, with bipartisan support, confirming the freedom of conscience of health care providers. More recently these laws were grouped together in HHS regulations which were adopted in Dec. 2008 by the Bush administration.

The one thing that the regulations added: "teeth." Enforceability. If a medical school tries to coerce a medical student to act against his or her conscience, that school can't receive federal funds.

For example, if a student is told he or she must participate in an abortion in order to pass a course--if that student's conscience prevents the student from performing an abortion or assisting with an abortion in order to pass a class or to graduate, currently the student must be excused. That student cannot be failed or prevented from graduating on that basis. If the school did prevent the student from graduating on that basis, they would not be eligible for federal dollars. Surprisingly, these types of situations do arise at medical schools.

But doctors and nurses in practice are also subject to similar types of pressures more often than you might expect. The reason the regulations came about in 2008 was that they were needed, and many health care providers had written to say the regulations were needed, during a lengthy period of public comment.

Now, these regulations are about to be overturned. To read about this issue, and to make your voice heard, go to www.freedom2care.org and look in the left hand side bar. Click to send a message to HHS, then click to respond either as a patient or as a provider, also in the upper left corner. Then you will be given a choice of a pre-written message, or the opportunity to write your own and have it sent to HHS. But act quickly because time is running out. April 9, 2009 is the deadline. Please send a message yourself, and ask others to do the same.

My Concerns over Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Following Obama's pen-stroke of death, I recoil at the term "integrity of science." Stem Cells from 21 sources of adults have extremely good science working for them: positive results; limited side effects and expected outcome: regeneration of new cells.

However, my problem with embryonic stem cells is three-fold:

1. It is bad science. The attempts conducted with legitimate research in 10,000 mice allegedly resulted in 70% dying of cancerous growths to the brain and the other 30% dying to other major diseases. It is a known fact among those who study stem cell biology, that embryonic cells are not yet distinguished. As a result, they go crazy when implanted in cells that are well distinguished. Thus, logically what hope is there that these 'baby' cells will ever regenerate adult tissue.

2. It does not work. Not one shred of scientific research shows any positive results with Embryonic Stem Cells

3.It kills a human life. In order to "research" any good that might come, a new life must first be destroyed. Those who want embryonic stem cells are the abortion trade. They want a reason to make more money on the back-side of abortion.

It is bad enough a woman chooses to have an abortion. How many more will choose abortion when the nurse says she can "donate the remains to medical science." I cannot accept this new executive order as legitimate science.

Ken Freeman

Another stroke of death of the unborn -executive order to be signed

President Obama will sign an executive order in less than 10 hours from time of this posting, lifting limits on human embryonic stem cell research and will direct federal agencies to alledgedly "restore scientific integrity" to decision-making, White House aides said Sunday according to a report posted by USA TODAY.

Obama's order follows years of the battles over stem cells and scientific decision-making between those who want to profit from aborted babies and the former administration's ban on such use. Sadly, the alledged scientific integrity is nothing less than a word game, because if these promoters of stem cell research were intellectually honest, they would admit that using aborted babies as a source has never shown positive results in humans. There have been on the other hand significant results from stem cells taken legitimately from human adult donors. In fact, this executive order is more about the degradation of the medial community through an open door on aborted and preborn babies.

BAD NEWS FOR UNBORN CHILDREN

"Public policy must be guided by sound scientific advice," said Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, discussing the order and memorandum Sunday."

The report also said: "Melody Barnes of Obama's Domestic Policy Council added that the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy will set standards for federal science advisers, insulating them from political interference."

What does this mean? Like a typical socialist totalitarian government, new offices appointed, not elected, will work for and report to the White House with full immunity from what they call "political interference." Thus, like China, a new federal agency will now make decisions that will impact abortion and the medical community. This link of research adds a new draconian dimension to the abortion trade.

Obama has been called the "abortion president" and it seems for good reason. He has lifted almost every ban on abortion. While he seems to have lied to the American people about many things, he has kept this one pledge made to Planned Parenthood's and NARALS and other pro-abortion organizations.

We know what government agencies do in the name of science in China. We know what the government's doctors did during the Third Reich. I wonder what this new office will be capable of in years to come.

NewsProlife

Fairness Doctrine brings about Thought Crime

stoptheconcon@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, March 6, 2009, 1:25 PM

"Action Alert" please consider this topic ! As most groups in the country are alerting Christan's to act on The Fairness Doctrine the very right to proclaim the full Gospel is at stake in our nation ! Please act to let your people know what is at stake with Hate (thought) Crimes ?. These two first links below are very important please watch them ! The first one is Pastor Ake Green who was convicted a couple of years ago for Hate Crimes by just preaching a sermon in his own church ! On this link you need to scroll to the " Ake Green Faith Under Fire" Oct. 06 windows media icon http://www.christian.org.uk/resources/video/index.htm The next link is a change in language to exciting U.K. law being imposed on them by the European Union. This is what will happen to the U.S. if these Hate Crime Laws are passed no matter what the original wording says when it is passed ! http://www.christian.org.uk/news/20090227/ban-on-criticising-gay-sex-is-attack-on-civil-liberty/ At the end of this "Action Alert" see How to kill the hate bills for instructions !

National Prayer Network


[NPN writer Harmony Grant marches in a pro-life protest
in northwest Portland, January 24, 2009.]


PRO-LIFERS AT GREATER RISK FROM HATE LAWS

By Harmony Grant
17 Feb 09


All Americans should protest the “anti-hate” bills before Congress, HR 256 and 262, which threaten our freedom of speech. But pro-lifers are especially at risk of arrest and censorship for “hate speech.” Incidents in Germany and Canada—as well as recent events in our own “free” nation!—demonstrate the danger of hate crime laws to pro-lifers.

Last Thursday, nine college-age pro-lifers were arrested and jailed in Alabama on charges of “criminal trespass.” They were giving out literature at a local high school, while standing on the public sidewalk! Police “handcuffed and arrested all nine [pro-lifers] without warning. One of the team members who did not assist in the distribution of literature was also arrested and handcuffed so tightly that it caused her to cry in pain… police confiscated the team’s video cameras and personal belongings, and impounded and searched the Campus Life Tour van. The police also asked the team members where they were staying so they could conduct a search in their hotel as well.”

Pro-lifers fare even worse in other states. In Oakland, CA, pastor Walter Hoye faces up to two years in jail and a $4,000 fine for carrying a sign, “Jesus Loves You. Can We Help?” outside an abortion clinic. He is charged with “harassment.”

Police were sensitized to Hoye and other pro-lifers by California’s 2004 “anti-hate” law SB 1234. Police in California now receive hate crime training called "multi-mission criminal extremism." A new category has been added: "anti-reproductive-rights crimes." Pro-lifers are automatically suspect.

Janet Folger of Faith2Action writes, “If I lived in California, I have a feeling my picture would be found at the local post office. If you think killing children is wrong, they're training people against you, too.”

Since pro-lifers are already persecuted under existing statutes, we can only imagine how the crackdown will intensify if federal “anti-hate” laws HR 256 and 262 are passed. Soon all American police will be trained to specifically target “hateful” pro-lifers, as they already do in California.

No Freedom for Canadian Pro-Lifers
Persecution of pro-lifers under existing statutes demonstrates the ferocity of public authorities to attack defenders of the unborn. As we have warned all along, the plight of our neighbors in Canada—where federal hate laws have already shattered free speech—will soon be ours if we don’t stop these bills. In 1994, Canadian pro-lifer Bill Whatcott spent 6 months in jail for praying on the public sidewalk outside an abortion clinic. In 2003, he was sentenced to 8 days in jail for displaying images of aborted fetuses. Police charged him with “criminal mischief” and “disturbing the peace.” In 2004, he was fined $15,000 for protesting Planned Parenthood on a public sidewalk. His total legal debts to date in defense of these charges, and others stemming from criticism of homosexuality, total at least $250,000.

In Canada, as in Europe, the government, and university administrators, are now speech police. Toronto Sun columnist Michael Coren writes of “pro-life clubs defunded and barred from meeting on college property in two universities in Ontario, pro-life stalls vandalized in Manitoba…” The German Law Journal explains, “Although the dangers of hate speech are concededly abstract, they are nevertheless seen as being real enough to warrant management by the government, whose task in this area can be termed as control of the political climate [emphasis mine].” This is the clear intent of hate crime laws: ultimately to control whatever the government defines as “hate speech,” thus “controlling the political climate”—and silencing objectors like those who fight for life.

But more on Germany later—there’s even more bad news from Canada. Last November, students at the University of Calgary faced police intimidation for their campus pro-life display. The university demanded that their large color photographs “face inwards”—obvious censorship—and threatened arrest and expulsion. The students courageously erected their display, which was no less gory than previous displays such as of torture in China.

“Under the watchful eye of numerous media cameras, the university did not arrest the students. But two months later, the university instructed Calgary police to deliver summons to these same students -- privately at their homes, with no media present.” This quote comes from John Carpay, a lawyer for the students, published in the National Post. These students have been charged with “trespassing” on their own campus, and will appear in court this Feb. 27.

Also this month, in Nova Scotia, pro-life presenters at St. Mary’s University were commanded to disband. Protestors descended on the event, which was called “Echoes of the Holocaust,” with “chants and yells,” disrupting the main speaker less than a minute into his speech, yelling, “No hate speech in our school!”

“They continued to shout until [the speaker] was forced to type on the projected screen in order to get his message to the audience…” Campus security did nothing, and then an administrator told the pro-lifers to break up the meeting!

Federal “anti-hate” laws were not even used in every case—official antagonism is so great that authorities used trumped-up charges of “harassment” and “trespassing” to persecute pro-lifers. Hate laws turn this antagonism into a clubbed fist because they empower the government to define the pro-life position itself—regardless of any action taken—as “hate.” That makes any pro-lifer vulnerable to prosecution the moment he or she takes a stand.

Hate Laws in Germany
Elsewhere, federal hate laws have already shown their practically exponential power. In 2007 in Ireland, a pro-lifer was arrested for displaying “offensive” material. She was detained and her “display board showing photographs of abortions was also seized.” Police showed up after just an hour of sharing leaflets and collecting signatures. Apparently someone found the work “offensive.”

It is terrifying that the words “offensive,” “hurtful,” or “hateful” have now become actionable legal concepts. This alone should spring pro-lifers into protest against hate laws. What could be more “hurtful” than showing an image of an aborted fetus to a woman who killed her child? What could be more “hateful” than stating the truth that abortionists kill babies?

The simple truth about this loaded issue can unsettle communities and hurt feelings—and that’s the point of pro-life protest! Few areas of public debate are more threatened by hate laws.

The German Law Journal explains the intentional vagueness of Germany’s own federal “anti-hate” law:

Similar to applicable provisions of international law, German statutes specifically refrain from requiring that racist [or other politically incorrect] messages lead to a clear and present danger of imminent lawless action before becoming punishable [emphasis mine]. A distant and generalized threat to the public peace and to life and dignity, particularly of minorities, suffices for legal sanctions irrespective of whether and when such danger would actually manifest itself…hate speech is generally prohibited—it is "speech minus" or "low-value speech," even if it addresses issues of high political importance.

Shamelessly this journal says German laws criminalize pure speech—even if it doesn’t incite violence! Any speech that might create a “distant and generalized threat to the public peace…suffices for legal sanctions!"

Two years previously, “In 2005, a German pro-lifer, Günter Annen, was sentenced to 50 days in jail for saying 'Stop unjust [rechtswidrige] abortions in [medical] practice,' because, according to the court, the expression 'unjust' is understood by laymen as meaning illegal, which abortions are not.”

Throughout Europe, pro-lifers face stigmatization which will eventually make them as detestable as Lerle the “anti-Semite.” In Britain, the BBC this month again aired a two-part drama that portrays pro-lifers as violent terrorists who kidnap children and lethally inject one of their hostages.

These incidents in Canada and Europe pose a sober warning to the American pro-life movement. For the last decade, our National Prayer Network has faithfully warned pro-lifers that they are in the crosshairs of “anti-hate” legislation. Yet, many seem to view white supremacists or critics of homosexuality as the only ones who should fear hate laws. Wake up!

If you believe in the sanctity of life, you must protest HR 256 and 262 to Congress. Call 1-877-851-6437 toll free or 1-202-225-3121 toll. Also, alert your pro-life organization about how hate laws can persecute and even destroy the pro-life movement in America. Watch our recent 10-minute video, How to Kill the Hate Bills — and take action.

We must rescue the lives of women and helpless, innocent babies from abortion. But pro-lifers must also save the freedom of the living. Otherwise, we will have no voice left to speak for the unborn.


Harmony Grant writes and edits for National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog group.


National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015